RSS FeedIntelligent Transportation and Logistics Meetup in Washington DC
Looking forward to the first meetup of the “Intelligent Transportation and Logistics” meetup group in Washington DC! On January 23rd, the Intelligent Transpologists of Washington DC metro area will meet to talk about “Silver Line Metro, Parking in the City and the Meta Issues”
Checkout the group, and if live in the Washington DC metro area, consider joining us that day! And while you are on the group site, please take our poll: What should our tag line be?
And while we are on the topic, did you see the Scientific American’s September 2011 Special Issue on Better, Greener, Smarter Cities? One statistic that I have been told is that of an urban area’s traffic, 30% is simply the people looking for parking. That sounds like a REALLY large fraction. Is that really true? If it is indeed true, then sounds interesting just to guess what might happen if that traffic could be eliminated. I would think that with 30% less traffic, and with traffic displaying such non-linear phenomenon, the effect on a cities traffic would be very significant.
Yet another reason for the transpologists to get together I guess!
PageRank, Android and iPhone – How to use naturally occurring capabilities to your advantage
The implementation of PageRank was a watershed moment in technology that showed us one thing – how naturally occurring data could be used to create an amazingly good score, and thus Crowdsourcing was born. Next up (many years later) was the YouTube (which was a Google acquisition, not an in house technology), but gelled pretty well with their crowdsourcing mentality. Next up (which took much longer to pull about), was the Android, which allowed Google to slowly penetrate a very crowded (no pun intended) cellphone market, again using the power of crowdsourcing. In this however, it had a clear precedent – Apple, although an amazingly unlikely proponent, had basically invented the app market concept for the cellphones, using the very successful iPhone app stores. Google was the one to realize that no matter how sophisticated your cellphone and OS is (BlackBerry), a crowd of spaghetti beats one strong rope, and further, crowdsourcing can only be competed with crowdsourcing. That competition between iOS and Android still goes on, and each of them tries to make their product sticky, by making people dependent not only on the device, but also on the myriad applications that those devices support. Now, BlackBerry is supposed to be coming up with its even better OS, but I wonder how much difference it can make,
considering that their OS was already the best one, in terms of robustness and OS level functionality. Where it got beat was simply by millions of apps, and that is where it clearly has a catch up role to play. How should it plan to compete with Android (or iOS) where millions of dedicated developers are writing interesting applications, and people are writing tutorials and books on how to create those interesting applications?
This idea of using naturally occurring data (or capabilities, if abstracted at one level) is not limited to cellphone market only. Examples abound in many other vertices. For examples, one of the reasons that NX CCS is so successful in integrating logistics data is that it simply uses the data that already exists – bills of lading, shipping notices, tracking information etc. Similarly, the success of TripIt is largely attributable to the fact that they simply use the reservation confirmations that already existed before their product came about. This idea itself can be considered an important ingredient in product stickiness – how much of what the product needs to work already exists? If the answer to that is, not so much, then clearly the idea or the product will have a shorter adoption cycle.
Has Google Gone Evil?
One of the premises of Google was “Do No Evil”. Their original claim to fame was the (Larry) PageRank algorithm, and while of course their algorithm has evolved entirely over the last 10+ years and is no longer as simple as the original PageRank, still, their moral standard was that: “No sponsorship can affect the quality of their search results.” In other words, you couldn’t just buy a higher rank in the search listing for a specific keyword. Sure, you can buy an ad spot using the Google AdWords for the keyword (say “insurance”) and if you can afford to pay $54.91 for each click, then sure, by all means, your website can be shown, but it will be shown on the side, and clearly marked with the word ‘Advertisement’.
This is where it gets interesting. What is “clearly marked”? How clear is clear? Is this clear enough for you? Is this clear enough? How about this: clear. This is the aspect in which Google’s moral standard has dropped faster than the housing market of 2008. Consider this snapshot that I took for doing a vanity search on enterprise dashboards.
I can still find out which of the top links are advertisements, I just have to hold my laptop screen at a few different angles. (It works out – just requires a little persistence. A bit of screen moving never killed anyone.)
So, I think all said and done, the links are clearly marked. Just depends on what you call clear. And certainly, Google hasn’t gone evil. Just depends on what you call evil.
Can a tablet be available for $10?
Amazon undercut Apple by 300$. Now Aakash has arrived for 45$. (Perhaps it is not a fair comparison, but still.) What is next in the tablet PC market?
When Suneet Singh Tuli, the producer of 45$ Aakash was asked if a 10$ tablet was possible, this is what he said: “When I got my first Macintosh, it cost $5000. Today for $45, I can take home an “Aakash”. Tomorrow, it could cost me $10.”
We may hear more from this guy in future.
Steve Jobs – RIP
“We just wanted to build the best thing we could build.” — Steve Jobs
This is a part of 3 favorite quotes by Steve Jobs. This line is the epitome of all successful product development. Best products are the ones that we create that we wanted to use. Whether it is the user interface, the back end, the wires, what have you – it should really be the best, even if no one will ever see it. This strategy is very different the strategy of General Motors, which tried to save money by building auto parts that were outliving the car itself to lower specifications. Well, their stock results are a bit different too.
RIP Steve.
Apps