RSS FeedPageRank, Android and iPhone – How to use naturally occurring capabilities to your advantage
The implementation of PageRank was a watershed moment in technology that showed us one thing – how naturally occurring data could be used to create an amazingly good score, and thus Crowdsourcing was born. Next up (many years later) was the YouTube (which was a Google acquisition, not an in house technology), but gelled pretty well with their crowdsourcing mentality. Next up (which took much longer to pull about), was the Android, which allowed Google to slowly penetrate a very crowded (no pun intended) cellphone market, again using the power of crowdsourcing. In this however, it had a clear precedent – Apple, although an amazingly unlikely proponent, had basically invented the app market concept for the cellphones, using the very successful iPhone app stores. Google was the one to realize that no matter how sophisticated your cellphone and OS is (BlackBerry), a crowd of spaghetti beats one strong rope, and further, crowdsourcing can only be competed with crowdsourcing. That competition between iOS and Android still goes on, and each of them tries to make their product sticky, by making people dependent not only on the device, but also on the myriad applications that those devices support. Now, BlackBerry is supposed to be coming up with its even better OS, but I wonder how much difference it can make,
considering that their OS was already the best one, in terms of robustness and OS level functionality. Where it got beat was simply by millions of apps, and that is where it clearly has a catch up role to play. How should it plan to compete with Android (or iOS) where millions of dedicated developers are writing interesting applications, and people are writing tutorials and books on how to create those interesting applications?
This idea of using naturally occurring data (or capabilities, if abstracted at one level) is not limited to cellphone market only. Examples abound in many other vertices. For examples, one of the reasons that NX CCS is so successful in integrating logistics data is that it simply uses the data that already exists – bills of lading, shipping notices, tracking information etc. Similarly, the success of TripIt is largely attributable to the fact that they simply use the reservation confirmations that already existed before their product came about. This idea itself can be considered an important ingredient in product stickiness – how much of what the product needs to work already exists? If the answer to that is, not so much, then clearly the idea or the product will have a shorter adoption cycle.
Has Google Gone Evil?
One of the premises of Google was “Do No Evil”. Their original claim to fame was the (Larry) PageRank algorithm, and while of course their algorithm has evolved entirely over the last 10+ years and is no longer as simple as the original PageRank, still, their moral standard was that: “No sponsorship can affect the quality of their search results.” In other words, you couldn’t just buy a higher rank in the search listing for a specific keyword. Sure, you can buy an ad spot using the Google AdWords for the keyword (say “insurance”) and if you can afford to pay $54.91 for each click, then sure, by all means, your website can be shown, but it will be shown on the side, and clearly marked with the word ‘Advertisement’.
This is where it gets interesting. What is “clearly marked”? How clear is clear? Is this clear enough for you? Is this clear enough? How about this: clear. This is the aspect in which Google’s moral standard has dropped faster than the housing market of 2008. Consider this snapshot that I took for doing a vanity search on enterprise dashboards.
I can still find out which of the top links are advertisements, I just have to hold my laptop screen at a few different angles. (It works out – just requires a little persistence. A bit of screen moving never killed anyone.)
So, I think all said and done, the links are clearly marked. Just depends on what you call clear. And certainly, Google hasn’t gone evil. Just depends on what you call evil.
Continuing Android Frustration
About two months after my move from BlackBerry to Android, I am reaching the following question: “Why are you using Android – are you a developer?” Let me explain – essentially, Android is Google’s selling platform as much as iPhone is Apple’s and BlackBerry is RIM’s. Google really wants you to use its online services, and they cannot really be reconfigured without rooting it (hence the reference to being a developer). You cannot get rid of pre-installed apps (such as Qik video chat) without rooting the phone either. Synchronization with Outlook is painful, and makes me really miss BlackBerry Desktop Manager. (I know that in the cell phones of 2020, I hypothesize that the synchronization problems will be non-issues in year 2020, but year 2020 is not when I am writing this review.)
There are a few other problematic things with Androids: 1) There is no way to control the data usage when roaming. So, you just need to keep switching the network on/off. If you leave it on, you could end up paying hundreds of dollars over 3/4 days, of course, depending upon what apps you have on. 2) YouTube app suddenly stops showing some videos whenever it likes. Restarting the phone plays the same videos without any problem. 3) Email coolly stops working whenever it wants – restarting the phone fixes the issue.
So, essentially, my Android is a fancy camera, a mobile router, a note talking app, and occasional video watching device (when phone is cooperating).
When again is the new BlackBerry touch coming out?
Smarter Cities
Smarter Cities (page 42) in the September 2011 issue of Scientific American does a good job of explaining crowd sourcing in Transportation context and comparing it to infrastructure based approach, “An ideal beginning is to leverage the growing array of smart personal devices we all weild and recruit people as the sensors of a city rather than relying on formal systems embedded into infrastructure. The traffic function on Google Maps is a good example. Instead of building a costly network of dedicated vehicle sensors along roadways…”.
This approach is very consistent with my previous experience of handling traffic congestion issues, especially those with a strong freight component to it, since the freight traffic often has a regulatory mechanism that is easier to interface with compared to passenger traffic. This YouTube video does a good job of explaining that. ITS has come a long way for cities, but many many more improvements can be made, if some more decisions can be made dynamically, as this paper explores.
Google’s aggressive Chrome positioning
As I waded through my computer migration today (a new Dell Latitude E 6510, replacing my Dell Latitude E 6500 after about 18 months of heavy use), couldn’t help but notice that Google is positioning Chrome very aggressively. Almost every program that I downloaded and installed on my comp (Skype, Winzip, Earth, PasswordSafe, SlickRun), came with the pre-checked “option” to “Include Chrome and make it my default browser”. Seems to be a bit of a desperate measure by Google, but looking at the recent performance by Chrome, it appears that strategy is working for Google. After all, how many people are going to carefully look at all program installation options. But that argument only gets Chrome on peoples’ machines. To actually get people to use it, Google is playing a slightly different game, promoting Chrome within specific uses, translation between one of them.
Apps